APPLETON — An Outagamie County Board panel said Monday the
state should dump plans to bury PCB-laden spoils dredged from Little
Lake Butte des Morts in a Vinland landfill.
The board’s Legislative, Audit and Human Resources Committee said
the state Department of Natural Resources should spend between $14
million and $34 million more than planned to neutralize the material
with heat.
Supv. Pat Stevens proposed the committee’s action, which goes to
a board vote Jan. 12.
“I don’t see why we should spend our own tax dollars to remove a
very dangerous substance from the Fox River and bury it in a
landfill where it could leak out,” Stevens said. “Why would we want
to create a situation where future generations will have to deal
with this problem all over again?”
Despite DNR assurances that landfilling is a safe and permanent
method of PCB disposal, area officials remain unconvinced,
contending the toxic material could leak from specially designed
landfills and contaminate soil and groundwater supplies 100 years
from now.
The resolution echoes one approved by the Winnebago County Board
on Oct. 30. Both petition the DNR to reconsider its decision to
spend $66 million to dispose of material dredged from Little Lake
Butte des Morts in a Vinland landfill owned by Georgia Pacific.
Vinland officials petitioned the DNR seeking the same
reconsideration Oct. 9.
The Winnebago resolution urges the DNR to spend between $80
million and $100 million vitrifying the material in gas furnaces
operated by Minergy, a Neenah-based corporation owned by Wisconsin
Energy. The heating process would transform the river sediment into
a non-toxic material that can be used in road construction.
“If we’re going to get rid of this stuff, let’s get rid of it
permanently,” Supv. Al Schmidt said. “Let’s not stockpile it in a
landfill only to create another problem down the road.”
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) were once used in the
manufacture of electrical equipment and in the production of
carbonless paper. They can cause serious health problems.
Schmidt said he saw no need for the committee to await a public
presentation by Minergy officials Jan. 27.
“It will be more costly today to do it this way, but from
everything I’ve read the 25 percent difference in (disposal cost) is
worth it.”